Default to Google: it’s a hard habit to break

From time to time SearchEngineWatch produces useful reviews of search engines other than Google.

Recently DuckDuckGo has been in spotlight. This was a useful article because the author really tried hard to give DuckDuckGo a proper trial and with some good results. However, as I too have found, making the break from Google is still hard to do and I’d pretty much agree that my reasons for continuing to “google” are the same as those given by the author.

That said, a lot of the time my searching only starts on Google which I use as a launch-pad to then go onto more specialist sites for the information I’m hunting down. But it’s that word “time” again – Google is quick to surface the right kind of results, and the searchenginewatch author found that she didn’t have time to play around with terms on DuckDuckGo when she could revert to Google and quickly find what she wanted. Importantly though, she does point out that this isn’t wholly down to the glory of Google, but more because we are so used to it, we know “how to work it” to get what we need.

Google probably remains the people’s favourite mostly due to its users’ familiarity with the engine and their lack of time. As long as we keep finding what we want and more quickly than via other search engines, loyalty will probably remain.

Since it tracks our searches (DuckDuckGo’s prime differentiator is its privacy) Google also has the advantage of being able to learn from the sheer volume of searches that take place. It processes over 40,000 search queries every second on average which, Internet Live Stats states, translates to over 3.5 billion searches per day and 1.2 trillion searches per year worldwide ( It’s quite dizzying watching the stats counter!

To do my bit to redress the balance, I will visit DuckDuckGo regularly to see how it compares and also for a change of scene. If you’re keen to have a change of scene too, searchenginewatch also recently published a handy list of 14 alternative search engines to try.

I always quite liked Dogpile!


Posted in About Google, Featured sites, Information literacy, Psychology of search, Search engines | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Public libraries are important – why?

Over recent years many famous authors have given their support to the public library sector as they try to help explain to the politicians and general public (especially those who rarely darken the doors of a public library) why we are in danger of losing a valuable, informative and social resource.

But it can still be hard – even for a corporate information professional like me, who instinctively feels that public libraries should be retained, funded and not watered down – to fully understand, appreciate, and therefore argue, as to why this should be.

A recent article in the Guardian makes that case far better than I ever could. It made me sit and up and think “yes, that’s why the demise of the public library really would be a huge loss to our society”. It was submitted anonymously, but clearly by a practising public librarian, and is the best contribution to the case for the continued existence of public libraries that I’ve read.


Posted in Future views, Information literacy, Latest news, People, Public libraries, Social networking | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Let the bells ring out, spreading harmony

An appropriately festive article of especial interest to me (as a bell-ringer, or “campanologist” if you like long words), entitled Ding dong measurement on high, swung into my in-box from ScienceDaily over the weekend and inspired me to think about my favourite news sources of 2015.

As they may also be of interest to you, if you’re looking for some really good science-cum-techy sources, here are my top five:

CB Insights news for start-ups and investment news, plus “the blurb” at the end which offers a selection of news from around the web, often worth a read, which comes with a hilariously informal style which often makes me smile (thanks, Anand)

(e) Science News which is an all round science news site powered by fully automated artificial intelligence, that is, it hasn’t got a human editor. Well, that’s different and seems to work quite well!

Gizmag for its coverage range, it doesn’t miss much. The articles have a good level of detail too (and there’s regular bicycle-tech news if you’re keen on cycling)

MIT Technology Review for the latest in high tech developments and another newsletter offering an interesting collection of selected stories from around the web.

And last, but not least, the aforementioned ScienceDaily, an excellent source for science news including research which may not always appear in the more main-stream publications.

May you have a merry and peaceful Christmas full of friendly harmonics, be it ‘Prime’, ‘Hum’ ‘Partials’, ‘Nominal’, or the variants Tierce (minor third), Quint (perfect Fifth) or Octave Nominal .



Posted in Featured sites, Latest news, Scientific sites | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Taylor & Francis offers free access to medical journals for 14 days

The title says it all really, all you have to do is to register on the Taylor & Francis website.

Then you will be able to enjoy 14 days of free access to all of their latest medical journal content published after 1997 across 30 key disciplines. Taylor & Francis is also offering access to their Expert Collection which they describe as the world’s largest series of review journals in research, development and clinical medicine.

Happy November!

Posted in Featured sites, Latest news, Open access, Scientific sites | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Financial Times content will be free to access on 9th September

Or, as the FT puts it: tomorrow (9th September), staying ahead of the game is even easier, with free content all day. So linger over the latest insightful articles, immerse yourself in thought-provoking comment and enjoy.

Worth taking the opportunity to have a browse around and see if they can lure you into taking out a subscription!

Posted in Featured sites, Latest news | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Reading on-screen content: are you still with me or have you given up reading this?

Back in 2008 The Atlantic ran an article looking at what the internet is doing to our brains. The author wrote that he’d noticed that reading articles on-line was apparently affecting the way we take in information and was having a detrimental effect on our ability to read with sustained concentration. We were all becoming skim-readers.

Seven years later and it would seem that the scientists agree that there’s some truth in this. An interesting (and quite readable!) recent article on Fast Company, Everything Science Knows About Reading On Screens, reports on various pieces of research examining how technology has changed the way we read.

One study suggests that the tactile feedback of reading from paper, turning the pages and seeing how far you’ve got, may actually help the reader process the  information being read. Does that mean that even if the e-reader shows you the percentage of your progress, or number of pages this still isn’t the same? Maybe so – the “paper” readers remembered more about the plot of the story.

I’d be very interested to know if a similar study has been done comparing people’s navigational experiences via satnavs versus paper maps – surely there are related aspects? Like a paper book, a map also gives you a tactile perspective (turning pages, following along a route) and you can also see how far you’ve got, whereas the satnav – not unlike the digital book – has a small screen that restricts the “mental map” of the journey – our brains must work differently in these mediums too (…or not at all, in some cases).

But I digress. The article also points out how distracting reading on screen can be – this is certainly true, as articles tend to have a lot of window-dressing around them (links to related content, adverts and so on). However, it could be argued that this provides a different advantage as you may then wander on to a better article or find out something new. You can browse through a book or a website, but each is a different experience, and I’d also add, technique.

The thing for me is, when it comes to the news, I’ve always skimmed paper newspapers, rarely reading a full article, so perhaps it’s more to do with what type of information you’re reading and maybe there’s not quite so much difference after all?

Hot tip for how to check that you can still read in-depth: last year I read “Daniel Deronda” (in paper format), which I loved and highly recommend if you would like to test your ability to read at length and in depth. Or you can substitute any sizeable tome of good literary standing to get the same confirmation.

So I’m not too worried about my concentration being disrupted. Did you read to the end of this? Thank you so very much!

Posted in Digital books, Future views, Information literacy | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

I finally made it to one of Karen Blakeman’s searching courses and it was excellent

For quite a long time I’ve been meaning to attend one of RBA Information Services‘s business information searching courses which cover the nuances of Google and so much more beyond that. Last Thursday I finally did.

For a start, it was a very useful benchmarking excercise-cum-sanity check to see how much I already knew and an opportunity to hone my search techniques further.

However, I can’t know everything about search, it’s a fast-moving world and this course was a source for new ideas, new sources and sites and offered different ways to search, techniques and tips. There was also plenty of time for discussion.

In short, it was a wonderful indulgence to be able to wallow in all things “searchy” for a whole day. It helped to pull me out of those searching-ruts that we fall into and refreshed and revitalised both the exploratory and specific nature of my searching.

How could your searching ever be disruptive otherwise? Highly recommended – thank you, Karen!

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

UK company accounts become freely available

Today’s money-saving tip: you no longer have to pay to access UK company filings.

Companies House has launched a Companies House beta site, with free registration through which you can access UK company filings without charge. They are asking for feedback, so don’t expect everything to be perfect.

I clicked on the pdf document link and up came a blank document – until I launched it properly in Adobe – then the text appeared. For one company, the latest accounts didn’t appear to be there, although I’d found them offered elsewhere.

So, when you search for UK companies you will also start to notice search results popping up from other UK company data sites offering this data. For example,  CompaniesintheUK came up in one general company search I carried out and provided its latest accounts free.

However, it’s worth checking that these other sites really are offering the full and latest accounts and that they are taken from Companies House, but you shouldn’t need to pay for this data any more.

Posted in Company data, Featured sites, Latest news | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Tip of the day: a neat ebook on Google search tips and tricks

Gizmag, which itself is an interesting read for anyone of techy-mindedness, is currently offering a free download to A Guide to Google Tools, Tips & Tricks You Can’t Live Without

You can fill in a form to download the book (62 pages), or access it directly from the first link above (you have to skip around the ads a bit). The book starts by pointing out that behind the simple front page of Google hides a wealth of search options and functionality that isn’t obvious to the user unless you take time to go exploring.

The continual simplifying of Google’s search page has been much criticised over the years by search gurus (such as Karen Blakeman and Phil Bradley), and not without justification. For example, the act of burying the “verbatim” command and the Advanced search, even though they’re not that deeply buried, still hides them from a good percentage of people who will never know to use these (or perhaps even what they’re for in the case of Verbatim) unless guided to use them by this blog or other search advisers.

Hence the existence of useful guides such as the one above. Knowing more about a search engine such as Google really will help your searching and I also find it speeds me up (yep, I’m always in a hurry to find stuff). Efficiency, bring on efficiency!

Posted in About Google, Digital books, Information literacy, Search engines | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Google news manoeuvers with a European flavour

News is a ubiquitous free and fee-based commodity on the web. There’s always a lot of it out there, with many duplicate and similar versions of the same story doing the rounds giving the appearance of even more news than there really is, contrasting with those more obscure hard-to-find items that are occasionally required.

This is also coupled with the near-impossibility for the poor journalist to enjoy a nice scoop for any length of time before rivals find out and jump on the same story.

It can seem quite overwhelming, trying to keep up with your areas of interest. Some people swear by Twitter for keeping up to speed (some just swear at it), others prefer in-depth reporting, staying loyal to the premium sources such as the FT or The Economist. Very many do both using social media for alerting and specific sources for in-depth.

Google has decided that its news service can do better and has announced its Digital News Initiative which may see Google consider a move to micropayments for access to premium sources that its news search picks up.

From reading some of the reporting: the FT article (you can register for free to access) Ars Technica’s version, The Guardian’s version (no doubt you can find more via a Google News search!), the emphasis is mostly on helping the press “find sustainable models” in order to preserve high quality journalism in this internet-age. Ah, that familiar challenge for all web-based businesses where so much of the content is free.

It’s also interesting to have a development driven from a European perspective, when so much tends to start out in the US and then ripple over to Europe after some time. The Guardian article cautions that, while this European perspective is all very well, the initiative will ultimately need to be adopted by Google in the US too.

We, us, the end-user-news-searchers barely get a mention in all of this. This is partly because Google is focusing on the news industry, having been criticised over the years by newspapers for robbing news sites of direct traffic and being unhelpful for subscription news sites. We come in where Google insists that it will be the consumer who ultimately influences the direction they go as regards payment models. So if we end up having to pay, it’s all our fault. Cynicism aside, anything that introduces more flexible payment models is probably a good thing – I would reckon that being able to access the FT on a pay-as-you-go basis via Google News for instance, could prove a popular option with many.

So, could this signal a move away from a free news service from Google or a move to the best of both: both free and pay-as-you-go to access the premium results? Should the premium news aggregators such as Factiva and LexisNexis also be worried? No doubt they’ll be watching carefully. I think they should be a little concerned as this initiative could, over time, result in a further erosion of their customer-base.

Disruptive to news searching? I hope so, I love a bit of disruption. Especially if it brings with it another choice in how we can search, access and pay for the news.

What do you think? Where do you go to find your news?

Posted in About Google, Business and management, Copyright, Featured sites, Future views, Latest news, Search engines | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment